tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post4261969909264668004..comments2024-01-17T16:47:58.588+08:00Comments on Dr Mahathir Mohamad: THE TUN SALLEH SAGADr. Mahathir Mohamadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12091124089828670796noreply@blogger.comBlogger585125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-24262308468434533172008-06-21T14:32:00.000+08:002008-06-21T14:32:00.000+08:00SadKluangman,Assalamualikum Tun,Hari ini disuratkh...SadKluangman,<BR/><BR/>Assalamualikum Tun,<BR/><BR/>Hari ini disuratkhabar, kita menyaksikan rasuah secara terang terangan yang diberi oleh PL melalui menteri yang kononnya menjaga kedaulatan undang undang negara ini yang biasa bergelumang dengan rasuah dan pernah di gantung keahliannya kerana rasuah juga. Diberi pula kepada bekas Ketua Hakim yang kononnya "maksum" - MERUPAKAN SEJARAH RASUAH SECARA TERANG TERANGAN TERBESAR DIDALAM SEJARAH MALAYSIA.<BR/><BR/>Kepada pemberi rasuah PL dan ZI nantikanlah masanya balasan dari rakyat pula kepada kamu. Kepada penerima, sanggupkah kamu memakan wang ex-gratia yang haram itu,duit tu duit rakyat maka tunggu sajalah pembalasannya kelak. Cubalah fahami mengapa ex-gratia itu diberi KEPADA KAMU? Kepada ulamak tolong keluarkan FATWA berhubung perkara ini.<BR/><BR/>Kepada TSA lagi tolonglah jangan merosakkan agama kamu setelah kamu sendiri merosakkan badan kehakiman negara ini. Kamu permainkan lagi Allah dan al quran kononnya Allah telah mengadili semuanya. Kamu silap dan sebenarnya kamu langsung tidak berpegang kepada tali Allah. Pada hakikatnya Allahlah yang melantik kamu dan Allahlah juga yang menyingkir kamu.Kalau benar kamu berpegang kepada AlQuran, masakan kamu samakan TDM dengan Ide Amin. Jelas kamu mempunyai niat yang jahat kerana kata kata kamu itu sangat bercanggah, dan merupakan kata kata orang yang tak takutkan Allah... tak relevan langsung tambahan lagi keluar dari mulut orang yang dikatakan YANG ARIF, melainkan ia lahir dari sifat dendam yang membara dan hasutan iblis jua( Sedarlah kamu bahwa kamu sebenarnya sedang ditipu sang iblis). Kalau betullah ada sedikit kesalahan TDM keatas kamu takkanlah kamu sampai menuduh dia Ide Amin, Maha Firaun dan sebagainya. Kami rakyat jelas sekali dapat menilai kamu melalui kata kata yang tak setimpal dengan gelaran keatas TDM itu. TDM tak pun menghina awak sampai ketahap itu dan orang2 ISLAM memang ditegah memberi gelaran yang sebegitu. Akhirnya, melalui kata kata kamu yang kesat itu yang digelar YANG ARIF, YANG BIJAKSANA, PENEGAK KEADILAN dan yang sewaktu dengannya secara sendirinya menampakkan kerendahan akal dan akhlak kamu.... sebenarnya atas sebab sebab inilah ALLAH membalas kamu. Ingat pada hakikatnya bukan TDM tapi ALLAH telah mengadili yang selayaknya keatas kamu. Dan kini, kamu sedang eksploitasikan oleh pemimpin yang jelas tidak mendapat sokongan rakyat dan sebenarnya peristiwa ini bukan seperti tanggapan kamu bahawa keadilan telah ditegakkan malah merupakan satu perkara yang sangat mengaibkan kamu, rakyat Malaysia dan badan kehakiman negara ini.<BR/>Sebagai sesama Islam saya perlu menasihatkan TSA bahawa elakkanlah diri dari mempunyai rasa RIAK. Itulah yang memakan diri tuan dan juga pemimpin kita masa ini. Kami tak kata kamu jahat mungkin dirumah kamu adalah bapa yang paling baik tetapi sifat RIAK itulah yang menjerumuskan kamu ketika itu. Badan kehakiman tidak boleh ditegur seolah2 Undang2 badan kehakiman itu ciptaan Allah walhal kamu tahu bahawa ia juga mempunyai kelemahan. <BR/>Kamu juga riak hanya atas perkara yang kecil "bunyi bising" sedangkan orang yang kurang arif dan orang bodoh macam kami pun pandai bersabar kalau jiran kita "renovate" rumah mereka malah keadaan lebih bingit kerana hanya sebelah rumah. Inikan pula jarak yang agak jauh antara istana raja dan " istana TSA". Nak tanya TSA, apa agaknya berlaku pada institusi penghakiman kita, kalau banyak kes yang dibicarakan membabitkan gangguan jiran? 26juta rakyat 26 juta kes.Adakah Dato' masitah juga, TSA yang galakkan?<BR/>Kamu RIAK kerana tidak mahu diadili oleh orang yang lebih rendah dari kamu. Tapi TSA, tiada rakyat maka tiadalah pemerintah, tiada rakyat maka tiadalah raja, inikan pula HAKIM. Cuba beritahu kami siapakah yang layak menghakimi TSA..... kalau bukan orang lebih rendah sudah tentulah pencipta yang MAHA AGUNG. Nah ...Bukankah keadilan itu sebelum ini telah terlaksana...because at the time of your removal as a Chief Justice you are found to be mentally disturbed and are unable to discharge your functions orderly and properly.<BR/>Kepada TDM , percayalah selagi kita benar insyallah kita akan dilindungiNYA. Kepada rakyat Malaysia berfikirlah , jangan sampai akal kita di akal. <BR/><BR/>TUN, selamat berjuang. Kirim salam saya pada Toh puan Siti Asmahjjhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02845199319055081609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-41040107986034321132008-06-20T20:21:00.000+08:002008-06-20T20:21:00.000+08:00A.kim TunSaya Tun di dalam soal pampasan ini ada s...A.kim Tun<BR/><BR/>Saya Tun di dalam soal pampasan ini ada satu perkara yang nak saya bangkitkan. Saya dapati salah seorang Hakim yang mendapatnya adalah Allahyarham Yusuf Abdul Kadeer. Yang mengejutkan saya megapa pampasan ini dibayar kepada anak tirinya yang bukan beragama Islam. Apa yang saya ketahui harta pusaka harus diurus oleh ARB dan perbicaraan kuasa diadakan untuk pewaris. Jika tiada waris yang hidup maka Baitulmal yang berhak.Salmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04208362075069086138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-65395040861425884012008-06-20T11:26:00.000+08:002008-06-20T11:26:00.000+08:00Dearest Tun,Your comments are indeed enlightening ...Dearest Tun,<BR/><BR/>Your comments are indeed enlightening as to your outlook and personal views on the Salleh Abbas saga.<BR/><BR/>I am not here to nit pick but it is essential for me to point out that when referring to the provisions of the Constitution, it shall be referred to as Article and not Section as you have done in this post.<BR/><BR/>Thank you.Azmihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01646613044242772162noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-10780532309067522112008-06-19T12:10:00.000+08:002008-06-19T12:10:00.000+08:00Salam YBBhg Tun,Akhirnya cerita lama dibuka jua, s...Salam YBBhg Tun,<BR/><BR/>Akhirnya cerita lama dibuka jua, setelah selama ini tersimpan, sememangnya saya pernah membaca satu artikel yang ditulis oleh Bekas Presiden Bar Committee di selatan tanahair berhubung cerita penyingkiran bekas CJ berhubung surat rungutan beliau terhadap kerja-kerja pembaikan kawasan istana, dan saya kira mulanya ianya cerita kosong, namun selepas saya diberi peluang membaca surat balasan dari Tun sendiri berhubung artikel tersebut barulah saya mengerti cerita sebetulnya apa yang berlaku. Dan kini ditambah pula penjelasan dari blog ini, semuanya jelas seperti terang lagi bersuluh.<BR/><BR/>YBBhg Tun,<BR/><BR/>Saya percaya, apa saja yg kita buat asalkan ikhlas semuanya akan berakhir dengan kebaikan. Biarlah apa saja komentar luar samada baik dan buruk asalkan Tun bertindak untuk kepentingan umum semuanya pasti diakhiri dengan 'Husnul Khatimah'<BR/><BR/>ikhlas dari rakyat marhaenNazleehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12973845511455117107noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-39221454831338158782008-06-16T03:18:00.000+08:002008-06-16T03:18:00.000+08:00salam Tun,Pertama sekali saya nak ucapakan bebanya...salam Tun,<BR/><BR/>Pertama sekali saya nak ucapakan bebanyak ribuan terima kasih pd tun yang pernah menjadi pemimpin yang plg sy sayangi..<BR/>kehebatan tun dlm memimpin tidak boleh saya huraikan kerana ia sangat infiniti..<BR/>Tun, saya sgt besetuju dengan semua kata-kata tun..walaupun saya hanyala seorang rakyat biasa tetapi apabila saya befikir sejenak, saya dapat lihat semakin banyak kesilapan demi kesilapan yang dilakukan oleh jentera kerajaan sehinggakan saya menangis apabila barisan nasional kalah teruk pada pilihanraya hari itu..tidak kah ini memberi pengajaran kepada mereka yang apa rakyat mahu pada masa ini..<BR/>Tun, saya harap suatu hari nanti mereka akan memahami setiap bait-bait kata yang tun tegur demi sayangkan bangsa dan negara..maaf tulis bahasa melayu sebab tak pandai sangat nak tulis bahasa inggeris.dulu sekolah melayu dan masa tu sains dan matemtik dalam bahasa melayu.wassalamanak jati kedahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00179931091786414376noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-88157283948017613102008-06-15T18:45:00.000+08:002008-06-15T18:45:00.000+08:00Hidup Tun....!!!Hidup Tun....!!!Siapa Kepateq ?https://www.blogger.com/profile/14049119973263743341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-468249650479553482008-06-15T13:58:00.000+08:002008-06-15T13:58:00.000+08:00Tun,Betul cakap Tun tentang bangsa Melayu, tau tap...Tun,<BR/>Betul cakap Tun tentang bangsa Melayu, tau tapi tak terus nak selidik puncanya.<BR/><BR/>Emm, saya pun terasa juga.Begitu rupanya kisah tun salleh abbas.<BR/><BR/>Lagi satu Tun, fakta Tun lama tu.Tun masih ingat ye.You were smart in the court that day!As a non-expert, you know law well.Good che det!MalayObserverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06785255640027564970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-2699264732597189192008-06-14T15:49:00.000+08:002008-06-14T15:49:00.000+08:00A'kum,Thank you for the explanation. Being a lawye...A'kum,<BR/><BR/>Thank you for the explanation. Being a lawyer myself, i feel sad about what happened todays. the V.K Lingam's issue and now they brought back the "poison pen" history. I have read D.George Seah's article and almost fell to you. Thank you for bring me the true picture and hope that fellow lawyers will see it too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-70980422386609239282008-06-14T02:40:00.000+08:002008-06-14T02:40:00.000+08:00Berikutan langkah kerajaan menaikkan harga minyak ...Berikutan langkah kerajaan menaikkan harga minyak baru-baru ini telah menambahkan kesengsaraan orang-orang miskin dan yang berpendapatan rendah. Bagi mengurangkan beban rakyat kononnya, Kerajaan menghebahkan bahawa orang-orang miskin/berpendapatan saja rendah diberi subsidi dengan memberi bayaran balik berdasarkan cc kenderaan. Walhal dalam masa yang sama kerajaan turut memberi rebat yang lebih tinggi kepada golongan kaya. Orang yang memiliki kenderaan berkuasa besar dikurangkan cukai jalan sehingga RM 200 (lebih kurang 1/3 daripada susidi yang diberi kepada orang miskin) dan kerajaan juga bakal menurunkan cukai pendapatan dan mengurang atau membatalkan cukai perkhidmatan. Langkah ini sebenarnya hanya akan menguntungkan orang kaya kerana rakyat yang miskin dan berpendapatan rendah tidak dikenakan cukai pendapatan serta jarang sekali ke kedai-kedai yang mengenakan cukai perkhidmatan ini kecuali kedai mamak. Itu pun biasanya sebulan sekali lepas gaji.<BR/><BR/>Oleh itu langkah pengurangan cukai yang dicadangkan ini seolah-olah memberi lebih susidi kepada golongan atasan dinegara ini termasuk PAK-PAK MENTERI yang mencadangkan langkah ini dan jumlahnya jauh lebih banyak dari susidi yang diberi kepada orang miskin. Jadi pemotongan cukai ini hanya menambahkan jurang pendapatan antara golongan atasan dengan yang berpendapatan rendah. Orang kaya semakin kaya manakala golongan yang kononnya di sasarkan iaitu yang berpendapatan rendah tidak mendapat apa-apa faedah.<BR/><BR/>Sebenarnya, langkah pemberian bayaran tunai kepada pemilik kenderaan juga tidak menguntungkan orang-orang miskin di kampung-kampung. Mereka terlibat secara langsung dengan kenaikan harga barang-barang keperluan tetapi tidak mendapat faedah dari langkah kerajaan ini. Ini kerana kebanyakan orang-orang kampung atau luar bandar terutama yang berpendapatan rendah memiliki motorsikal buruk yang hanya layak digunakan untuk ke kebun sahaja. Oleh itu kenderaan mereka ini tidak memiliki cukai jalan dan oleh itu mereka tidak layak mendapat bayaran tunai dari kerajaan.<BR/><BR/>Sekiranya hendak membantu golongan bawahan di Negara ini, kerajaan sepatutnya menimbangkan kembali kadar kenaikan harga minyak kerana ia sangat membebankan rakyat terutama golongan bawahan. Langkah-langkah yang diambil oleh kerajaan juga sebenarnya tidak membantu golongan bawahan malah membantu golongan atasan yang tidak sepatutnya diberi susidi lagi. Sepatutnya kerajaan menaikkan cukai pendapatan dan cukai-cukai lain bagi menampung subsidi minyak kerana langkah ini tidak melibatkan golongan berpendapatan rendah malah melibatkan golongan berpendapatan tinggi.<BR/><BR/>Saya sebagai rakyat dan pembayar cukai yang prihatin berharap agar kerajaan memikirkan bersungguh-sungguh semua langkah yang hendak diambil sebelum ia dilaksanakan dan bukannya melaksanakan langkah-langkah yang hanya sedap didengar tetapi tidak bermanfaat kepada golongan sasaran malah merugikan rakyat. Langkah kerajaan dalam beberapa bulan ini kelihatan seperti melepaskan batuk di tangga dan kelihatan tiada kesepakatan di dalam kerajaan seperti kata Tun Mahathir, “langkah tunggang terbalik”.<BR/><BR/>Sekian.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-47044826032402465442008-06-13T11:37:00.000+08:002008-06-13T11:37:00.000+08:00Dearest Tun,I've read Tun Salleh's book, and now i...Dearest Tun,<BR/><BR/>I've read Tun Salleh's book, and now i also read your side of story.<BR/><BR/>I can accept your explanation. You are truly correct with your decision. But i share the same view with previous post by Akil.<BR/><BR/>Tun Salleh Abas deserved to be removed and you have done correctly and safely according to the constitution.<BR/><BR/>Tapi, kalu lah Tun Salleh ni jadi YESMEN macam hakim2 lain...rasanya Tun Salleh Saga, ending dia bukan macam tu...betul tak Tun?<BR/><BR/>Tun pun sendiri menngaku nya TUN annoyed dengan letter Tun salleh Abas....<BR/><BR/>For me Tun Salleh Abas bukan chicken.. cuma mungkin dia tersilap langkah nak lawan TUN...sama macam Anwar.<BR/><BR/>Bila TUN nak explain pasal pemecatan Anwar pulak?.Mahashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02097761177759763831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-32602057017936815542008-06-12T15:32:00.000+08:002008-06-12T15:32:00.000+08:00the post we have been waiting for. Thank you Tun. ...the post we have been waiting for. Thank you Tun. You just won my undying support.butterbrowniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02134016796291493303noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-50833780816703860552008-06-11T19:28:00.000+08:002008-06-11T19:28:00.000+08:00Asslmlkm Tun,Hari ini sy meluangkan seharian memba...Asslmlkm Tun,<BR/><BR/>Hari ini sy meluangkan seharian membaca blog Tun. Satu persatu isu sy mula fahami. Komen2 baik & buruk smua sy baca & tapisi. Byk yg sy mulai tahu & fahami. Pengetahuan sy makin byk. Sy semakin menyayangi & menyanjungi Tun. <BR/><BR/>Apapun yg tk baik tntg Tun yg org perkatakan, sy tk peduli sgt. Bg sy, semasa zaman pemerintahan Tun, sy dpt rasakan Malaysia ini amat makmur & membangun. Paling penting skali, M'sia ialah negara Islam yg mempunyai pemimpin Islam yg boleh mcapai pelbagai kemajuan di mata dunia.<BR/><BR/>Bg sy, molek benar Tun adakan blog begini agar dpt mjwb kecaman & tuduhan agar ramai lg org spt sy fahami isu sbnr. <BR/><BR/>Kalau ddaftarkn keahlian dah cukup sgt untuk kita mjadi sbuah parti yg kuat. PARTI TUN DR MAHATHIR<BR/><BR/>Wasalam..noriyatihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10382817487868128062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-90032233938181543472008-06-11T17:40:00.000+08:002008-06-11T17:40:00.000+08:00My dear Tun,Apocalypse now.......!!!!We need you t...My dear Tun,<BR/>Apocalypse now.......!!!!<BR/>We need you to discover more and more without favour and fear.<BR/>We are stand by you.GHAZAMADhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02626144882082886116noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-55871913616557938672008-06-11T16:32:00.000+08:002008-06-11T16:32:00.000+08:00assalamualaikum...semoga Tun berada dalam keadaan ...assalamualaikum...<BR/><BR/>semoga Tun berada dalam keadaan sihat. secara jujur saya memang menyokong Tun dari dulu atas kebijaksanaan Tun mentadbir negara. pelbagai tindakan Tun yg diluar jangkaan saya menyebabkan saya begitu kagum dengan Tun. semasa Tun melantik paklah menjadi timb. PM dn seterusnya menyerahkn pentadbiran negara kepada paklah saya sangat tidak setuju dan bimbang. ternyata sangkaan saya btol apabila sedikit demi sedikit negara menjadi goyah. sepanjang pentadbiran paklah saya tak nampak apa yang paklah buat untuk meningkatkan kemajuan negara. sikap paklah yang penakut dan berdiam diri menunjukkan beliau bukan seorang pemimpin yang berkaliber. paklah tidak pandai mencari duit untuk negara malah menghabiskan duit bersama menantu beliau je.<BR/><BR/>saya amat berbangga jika berpeluang bekerja bersama Tun dan kagum dengan pemikiran Tun.saya tahu tindakan Tun keluar parti kerana kecewa dengan UMNO yg makin PARAH. tentu Tun berasa kecewa UMNO yg sebelum ni memperjuang bangsa dah bertukar menjadi parti paklah.. saya begitu kecewa seperti mana Tun rasakn sekarang. <BR/>saya berharap Tun dapat lakukan sesuatu untuk bangsa melayu.saya sokong Tun Dr. Mahathir..Mohamed Zaidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08243407090904472483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-35817674856342429712008-06-11T11:13:00.000+08:002008-06-11T11:13:00.000+08:00Tun,I had always thought you did wrong in this tun...Tun,<BR/><BR/>I had always thought you did wrong in this tun Salleh issue and was very disappointed with you. What more with my uncle (my guardian) constantly bitching about this in my presence!! Boy! men can bitch far better than women!<BR/><BR/>In my little brain, I thought you did what you did because you had to ensure the survival of your party and perhaps yourself in the cabinet. Yah, if you thought Malaysia cannot do without you then, you were right. We, the whole bunch of Malaysians, all races, all age, all gender and colour, no matter what we have to say or how ungrateful we may sound at times, cannot afford to lose you then and definitely not now...Hmm..is that dependency!? <BR/><BR/>Anyway, now that the facts are made known, although to me, I view it as the Agung then, aka Sultan of Johor, is perhaps petty to be offended by the whole circus. Yes, Tun Salleh was obnoxious with all the complains and whining... like a brat.. but this whole "bad for your image" can be avoided if ALL took a little step to be a little bit more HUMAN! <BR/><BR/>Sultan can call Tun Salleh for an audience and thrash him to bits for being a whinner.. Tun Salleh could have politely mention it to the Agung that the renovation is giving him a massive headache and therefore, will affect his job instead of writing to the Agung, cc to all the rest of the blue blood to see and you, could have been saved from all the bad publicity and accusations. <BR/><BR/>So, my apologies for judging you before knowing the whole truth.Pearlshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17747677337192235229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-80859439296500265562008-06-11T09:47:00.000+08:002008-06-11T09:47:00.000+08:00PARDON ME SIR but the MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION is, ...PARDON ME SIR but the MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION is, may I kindly ask how you could remember such intricate details when all these happened back in 1988, while you had an acute attack of severe amnesia while facing the Royal Commission on LingamGate which is relatively new? Is this the Selective Memory Syndrome (SMS)?<BR/><BR/>Best regards to you and your family.DoctorWhohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02018634074547645816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-57749057049328985592008-06-11T02:02:00.000+08:002008-06-11T02:02:00.000+08:00High Court judge makes explosive judicial disclosu...High Court judge makes explosive judicial disclosures <BR/>Posted by labisman <BR/>Tuesday, 10 June 2008<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>By Danny Wong, The Borneo Post<BR/><BR/>SIBU: A High Court judge here yesterday made some startling revelations at the commencement of the proceedings of the election petition filed by the DAP candidate for the Sarikei parliamentary seat, Wong Hus She, to declare the result of the March 8 general election for the seat void.<BR/><BR/>The Barisan Nasional candidate, Ding Kuong Hing, won the seat with a slim majority of 51 votes.<BR/><BR/>Justice Datuk H C Ian Chin informed the parties in open court that he had certain disclosures to make at the start of the proceedings, saying he was doing so to forestall any complaints that might be made by the parties later.<BR/><BR/>He said complaints had been made against him in an earlier case that he had failed to disclose the detention of his father and brother during the time of the Mustapha regime in Sabah in late 1969 and the early 1970.<BR/><BR/>Chin then proceeded to make his disclosure the contents of which could only be described as explosive, coming hot on the heels of the findings of the Royal Commission in the Lingam video tape.<BR/><BR/>He started by saying that “it is better to err on caution that I take this step to shortly disclose what the parties and counsel may not be aware but which they may later complain that I should have disclosed”.<BR/><BR/>“I take this course also because I am smarting over the complaint that the detention of my father and brother during the time of the Mustapha regime in Sabah in late 1969 and the early 1970 should have been but not disclosed. (See Sabah Foundation & 2 Ors vs Datuk Syed Kechik & Anor, Kota Kinabalu High Court at here)<BR/><BR/>“What I am going to disclose relate to what happened after two of my judgements were handed down. One was the judgment in a libel case which I handed down on February 5, 1997 (see Raveychandran v Lai Su Chon & Ors at here) by which I distinguished MGG Pillai V Tan Sri Dato Vincent Tan Chee Yioun & Other Appeals (1995) 2 MLJ 493 and refused to give what I consider to be astronomical award for damage to reputation in libel cases,” he said.<BR/><BR/>Chin said the other was the judgement handed down on Feb 13, 1997 in respect of an election petition (Donald Lawan v Abang Wahed bin Abang & Ors [Sri Aman High Court]) by which he set aside the election of Mong Dagang.<BR/><BR/>“Shortly after those two judgements, the Judges Conference was held from April 24, 1997.<BR/><BR/>The then prime minister was scheduled to have a dialogue with the judges on that date. What was termed a dialogue and later reported as one was anything but a dialogue.<BR/><BR/>“The then prime minister went there to issue a thinly veiled threat to remove judges by referring to the tribunal that was set up before and stating that though it may be difficult to do so, it was still done. He said all that after he had expressed his unhappiness with what he termed ‘the Borneo Case’ and after he had asked whether the judge who decided that case was present or not.”<BR/><BR/>Chin said no one had any doubt that he was referring to the election case though he (then prime minister) did not mention it specifically which he decided on Feb 13, 1997.<BR/><BR/>Added the High Court judge: “After he was done with issuing that threat, he then proceeded to express his view that people should pay heavily for libel.<BR/><BR/>“He managed to get a single response from a Court of Appeal judge who asked whether he would be happy with a sum of RM1 million as damages for libel.<BR/><BR/>“He approved of it and he later on made known his satisfaction by promoting this judge (since deceased) to the Federal Court over many others who were senior to him when a vacancy arose.<BR/><BR/>“I was devastated after hearing all that but help came immediately after the “dialogue” was over when Federal Court judges came to my side and asked me to ignore him. Equally comforting were the words of my brother High Court judge who later told me that the then Prime Minister was too much.<BR/><BR/>“It will be recalled that the then prime minister not long after he assumed office had said, in a much publicised campaign against corruption, that he will put the fear of God in man but this apparently, given his diatribe in that conference, changed to instilling a fear of him if any judgment is to his dislike.”<BR/><BR/>Chin went on to say that to commemorate his “dialogue” with the judges a group picture was taken (which can be viewed by going to http://www.kkhighcourt.com/JudgesnMahathir.htm).<BR/><BR/>To rub it in, he said, Bernama circulated a press release with one appearing in a Sabah newspaper (The Daily Express May 25, 1997) which “was far from stating the truth”. A month later, Chin said he was packed off to a boot camp from May 26-30 together with selected judges and judicial officers.<BR/><BR/>He said that the boot camp was without any doubt “an attempt to indoctrinate those attending the boot camp to hold the view that the government interest as being more important than all else when we are considering our judgement”.<BR/><BR/>“Stating this devilish notion was by no less a person than the President of the Court of Appeal. Everyone was quiet during the question sessions. Also invited to the boot camp was a lecturer from a university who berated the election case and the bright spot in this episode was that a judicial officer, during question time, told the lecturer that she had no question but only a statement to make which was that the lecturer was in contempt of court.<BR/><BR/>“The then prime minister was scheduled to talk but he did not turn up and instead sent his then deputy who instead of talking invited questions and the one question I remembered being asked was — Are politicians looking for girls when they are often seen loitering at posh hotel lobbies?<BR/><BR/>“The perversion of justice did not stop there. My brother judge Kamil Awang was one morning looking for me after clocking in; we were both then serving in Kuching, Sarawak. When I met up with him in his chambers he was distraught and he told me that he had last night received a telephone call from the then Chief Justice asking him to dismiss the election petition that he was going to hear in Kota Kinabalu.<BR/><BR/>“He sought my opinion as to what to do with the telephone call.<BR/><BR/>“We went into the possibility of making a police report or of writing to the Chief Justice a letter to record what he had said over the telephone but in the end he decided against it since it will be his words against that of the Chief Justice,” he said.<BR/><BR/>Chin told the court that he was happy to later on learn that Kamil did not bow to the pressure by the Chief Justice and went on to hear the petition and thereafter making a decision based on the law and evidence.<BR/><BR/>The High Court judge said he had twice stood unsuccessfully as a Barisan Nasional candidate for a parliamentary and later for a state seat in Sabah in the 1980s and in one of those elections he was defeated by a DAP candidate.<BR/><BR/>He said he had also heard other election petitions, namely Yusuf Abdul Rahman v Abdul Ajis & Ors and Lee Hie Kui v Song Swee Guan & Darrell Tsen.<BR/><BR/>“Now, though no longer the prime minister and so no longer able to carry out his threat to remove judges which should therefore dispel any fear which any judge may have of him, if ever there was such fear, nevertheless the coalition party that he led is still around and the second respondent won on a ticket of that coalition party and it may cross someone’s mind that I may have an axe to grind against the party concerned or any member thereof.<BR/><BR/>“The petitioner in this case may also have similar view with regard to my defeat by a candidate standing on the ticket of a party to which he belongs.<BR/><BR/>” So I wish to hear from the parties as to whether they (counsel or parties) in this case entertain any such notion and whether they wish to apply for my recusal so that, if any, I can make a decision thereon.<BR/><BR/>“After this disclosure, litigants who were affected by the hundreds of judgment that I had handed down since those infamous days may justifiably worry as to whether any of my judgments were in any way influenced by this attempt to hang the Sword of Damocles over my head.<BR/><BR/>“No amount of words from me would assuage you of your worry; you will have to read my judgments as to whether they are according to the evidence and the law or whether they were influenced by threat.”<BR/><BR/>Chin then adjourned for half an hour to let the parties digest what he had said and to consider whether they wished to make any application for his recusal.<BR/><BR/>However, they expressed their full confidence in him in presiding over the hearing of the case. <BR/><BR/>I thought you might want to know.SoundManhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14213473313924891967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-13745975638783731572008-06-10T23:56:00.000+08:002008-06-10T23:56:00.000+08:00eehh Tun...you still remember about tun salleh aba...eehh Tun...you still remember about tun salleh abas??...i thought in court you said you could not remember about it.<BR/><BR/>haaa....kantoi!!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17457947528023488708noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-85565093798808202642008-06-10T23:40:00.000+08:002008-06-10T23:40:00.000+08:00Wonder how you remembered this so vividlyWhen not ...Wonder how you remembered this so vividly<BR/>When not so long ago, you forgot so easily<BR/>Why explain yourself now?<BR/>20 years we wondered who committed the foul<BR/>Are these the entire story?<BR/>What else are in this case history?<BR/>So, can we get the whole story<BR/>and bring to end this mystery<BR/><BR/>Is AAB any better?<BR/>Any cleaner?<BR/>Or just more of the same<BR/>Everyone playing your game<BR/>Only the poor public remain ignorant and stupid<BR/>Believing the media, our Malaysian habit<BR/>Dirty linens are now washed in public<BR/>The stench, the dirt, really make me sick <BR/>But then, without this <BR/>Malaysians will have no bliss<BR/><BR/>So, dear Tun, keep your blogs going<BR/>For the public will soon sing<BR/>A farewell song to the past<BR/>A new beginning, hopefully one that lastsnangkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03883799152131840646noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-56376855947823830222008-06-10T22:04:00.000+08:002008-06-10T22:04:00.000+08:00Salam Tun,Izinkan nak komen sikit tentang komen si...Salam Tun,<BR/><BR/>Izinkan nak komen sikit tentang komen si nickname PJ;<BR/><BR/>FYI Cik PJ, sebenarnya judge Ian Chin nak tarikh perhatian Pak Lah dalam suasana camni.... jadi ada peluang dia nak jadi Chief Judge of Borneo.... bukan apa ada udang disebalik mee siam..... hehehe<BR/><BR/>Pak Lah kan suka orang kowtow sama dia... so Ian Chin apa lagi... nak ambil peluang ler.... judge mana malu lagi nak berlobby la ni...Terongpipithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01844497659041903677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-79139317015973581032008-06-10T16:58:00.000+08:002008-06-10T16:58:00.000+08:00Breaking news...Borneo Post,June10, 2008.High cour...Breaking news...Borneo Post,June10, 2008.High court judge ,Datuk H.C.Ian Chin, reveal that the long arms of Tun Mahathir have even reach across the vast South China Sea to the backward states of the land of the Hornbills,Sarawak,and manipulates the judiciary in favour of the gov't.WOW, honestly that was a extremely long ones.Now then,Tun,this accusation comes directly from the mouth of the judge,so it's guilty until proven otherwise.The judge score a bull eye.A 10 for Ian Chin,what a daring broad daylight ROBBERY.Is only make less attractive because Borneo Post nervously down grade it to headline no 2,putting it at the bottom of the front page.They should put it on top of the front page.Till today they are still trembling from the after effect of MAHATHIRISM .The V.K.Lingam tape is nothing compare to this Sarawakgate.Tun, this is the final nail to your coffin.I can't sleep,anxiously waiting for your comments on this matter.The quiet towns of Sarawak has suddenly woke up to this STARTLING NEWS of the year.Amen!!NEILhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02897633753448797927noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-45460336310976017272008-06-10T15:51:00.000+08:002008-06-10T15:51:00.000+08:00Tun, You have given a twised version of what reall...Tun, <BR/>You have given a twised version of what really happened then. You did get Tun Salleh Abas sacked, using Tun Hamid Omar as your stooge. You very cleverly manipulated the setting up of the tribunal. Prof Ari has given you a full response to this blog of yours and you should read it.<BR/>It was also the same with Anwar Ibrahim. From the way Augustine Paul conducted the case, we knew that you had framed and set up Anwar. You fabricated evidence to lock him up. VK Lingam has revealed this recently and you must be fuming mad at VKL for having been stupid.<BR/>Stop giving distorted versions of what happened. We don't believe you 100%.Navihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15130596733343021396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-36195121600757499252008-06-10T15:07:00.000+08:002008-06-10T15:07:00.000+08:00I started my law study in 1988. I have no personal...I started my law study in 1988. I have no personal direct contact with you whatsoever. <BR/><BR/>This Tun Salleh Saga in my opinion is the classic story of the way carrot & stick being used. You had offered carrot, but was refused by few very principled men (the untouchables). Therefore you used stick against the untouchables. You used carrots & sticks for your henchmen (which continue doing the same - you breed them) to do the dirty jobs for you. <BR/><BR/>Now you aim to be the armchair critics by blogging. It show what kind of a man you are. The statements produced in this blog coming from an ex-stateman, shows what kind of stateman you are. Res ipsa loquitor.YSLimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15392663902108992472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-38638492532779730442008-06-10T14:52:00.000+08:002008-06-10T14:52:00.000+08:00Adakah anda pernah makan roti canai bengkok?? must...Adakah anda pernah makan roti canai bengkok?? mustahilkan, mungkin anda tidak percaya roti canai bengkok akan dipasarkan di The LOAF ( kedai roti milikan Tun) <BR/><BR/>Kenapa Tun tidak jual makanan melayu seperti ketupat? roti jalal, lemamg satay, nasi lemak??? di Loaf, padahal dasar Pandang ketimur masih dilancarkan, kononnya ajak Melayu makan roti Jepun. <BR/><BR/>Hairan saya jarang nampak Tun memakai songkok ??? <BR/><BR/>Beliau begitu pandai memainkan sentimen melayu, dan dapatkan sokongan dari kaum Melayu, tapi disebaliknya beliau tidak memupuk semangat kemelayuan. ini amat contradict. <BR/><BR/>Memang pun roti canai berbentuk bulat, pusing macam mana pun nampak bulat. asalkan orang caya tak perlu guna otak fikir. Sudah beres!!<BR/><BR/>Balik kepada jambatan bengkok, kita dapat fahami, kalaulah gerai mamak yang menjual roti canai ditepi jalan itu, tiba tiba nak extant gerainya tanpa persetujuan dari DBKL. macam mana DBKL uruskan? DBKL mestinya<BR/>1) Surat permohonan dan plan <BR/>2) kalau tengah bina bagi surat warning DBKL, <BR/>2) Kalau terus bina tanpa permohonan, maka robohkan saja <BR/><BR/>Begitu juga kes jambatan bengkok, tanpa persetujuan dari Singapore dengan Malaysia, maka ia tidak akan tercapai. memang kita tidak fahami apakah selok belok dalam kandungan agreement kedua dua negara , kononya OSA, kalau siapa bocor, masuk penjara. Memang Rakyat pun tidak mempunyaio kuasa untuk mengatahuinya, saya percaya bukanlah semudah apa yang dikatakan Tun itu. <BR/><BR/>Cuba fikirkan, kenapa pampasan 1 bliion kepada kontractor di Johor? ini adalah kerana Tun sendiri yang mengarahkan kontractor membina, adalah diketahui kontractor adalah syarikat kroni Tun sendiri, sebelum mendapat apa apa confirmation dari pihak Singapore, Tun telah membina , Jadi apa yang namapak hari ini adalah hasil gajah putih Tun sendiri, Siapakah yang patut persalahkan? Siapa yang membawa anak gajah putih itu parking di JB?? <BR/><BR/>Cuba fikirkan, waktu pemerintahan Tun, negera manakah yang paling dibenciinya? Isreal, singapore , amerika. kenapa??? -- sentiment!!<BR/><BR/>Jadi kenapakah panah selalu menuju ke Singapore dan jadikan singapore sebagai whipping boy?? - sentiment! <BR/><BR/>Mudah saja, kerana singapore dapat disymbolkan sebagai negara yang majoritinya di diami oleh kaum Cina. Jadi Tun mengambil langkah ini mengujudkan semangat benci terhadap kaum cina di malaysia. dan memupuk semangat Ketuanan Melayu. - Sentiment<BR/><BR/>Tun adalah Sentiment !! Tun adalah pakar sentiment. Kerana kepentingan Tun sendiri, Tun jadi sentiment! Kekecohan tun terhadap jambatan bengkok bukanlah apa.... sebab lepas bersara, Tun tiada pendapatan untuk support kuncu kuncunya yang begitu banyak, maka derhakalah kuncu kuncunya. Memang Tun seorang gentlement, tetapi kekurangan duit adakan memusnahkan segala galanya empayarnya. <BR/><BR/>Jadi Lepas bersara, duit kurang, power kurang, semuanya kurang inilah sebabnya Tun marah marah , bertubio tubi hentam kerajaan.caxantimamakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05306088584990747165noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4220966807166570924.post-7016835604844463962008-06-10T14:18:00.000+08:002008-06-10T14:18:00.000+08:00Memang pun mamak pandai buat roti canai, baunya be...Memang pun mamak pandai buat roti canai, baunya berlainan, sedap dikunyah, sedap dimakan, malah kalau mamak buat cerita, dari kerala sampai putrajaya. tak habis habisan , semua orang percaya. Tetapi malangnya zaman internet, kesemua rahsia mudah terbongkar ...caya kah?? <BR/><BR/>sumbangan <BR/>http://www.malaysia-today.net/2008/content/view/8620/1/<BR/><BR/> SIBU: A High Court judge here yesterday made some startling revelations at the commencement of the proceedings of the election petition filed by the DAP candidate for the Sarikei parliamentary seat, Wong Hus She, to declare the result of the March 8 general election for the seat void.<BR/><BR/>The Barisan Nasional candidate, Ding Kuong Hing, won the seat with a slim majority of 51 votes.<BR/><BR/>Justice Datuk H C Ian Chin informed the parties in open court that he had certain disclosures to make at the start of the proceedings, saying he was doing so to forestall any complaints that might be made by the parties later.<BR/><BR/>He said complaints had been made against him in an earlier case that he had failed to disclose the detention of his father and brother during the time of the Mustapha regime in Sabah in late 1969 and the early 1970.<BR/><BR/>Chin then proceeded to make his disclosure the contents of which could only be described as explosive, coming hot on the heels of the findings of the Royal Commission in the Lingam video tape.<BR/><BR/>He started by saying that “it is better to err on caution that I take this step to shortly disclose what the parties and counsel may not be aware but which they may later complain that I should have disclosed”.<BR/><BR/>“I take this course also because I am smarting over the complaint that the detention of my father and brother during the time of the Mustapha regime in Sabah in late 1969 and the early 1970 should have been but not disclosed. (See Sabah Foundation & 2 Ors vs Datuk Syed Kechik & Anor, Kota Kinabalu High Court at here)<BR/><BR/>“What I am going to disclose relate to what happened after two of my judgements were handed down. One was the judgment in a libel case which I handed down on February 5 1997 (see Raveychandran v Lai Su Chon & Ors at here) by which I distinguished MGG Pillai V Tan Sri Dato Vincent Tan Chee Yioun & Other Appeals (1995) 2 MLJ 493 and refused to give what I consider to be astronomical award for damage to reputation in libel cases,” he said.<BR/><BR/>Chin said the other was the judgement handed down on Feb 13 1997 in respect of an election petition (Donald Lawan v Abang Wahed bin Abang & Ors [Sri Aman High Court]) by which he set aside the election of Mong Dagang.<BR/><BR/>“Shortly after those two judgements, the Judges Conference was held from April 24 1997.<BR/><BR/>The then prime minister was scheduled to have a dialogue with the judges on that date. What was termed a dialogue and later reported as one was anything but a dialogue.<BR/><BR/>“The then prime minister went there to issue a thinly veiled threat to remove judges by referring to the tribunal that was set up before and stating that though it may be difficult to do so, it was still done. He said all that after he had expressed his unhappiness with what he termed ‘the Borneo Case’ and after he had asked whether the judge who decided that case was present or not.”<BR/><BR/>Chin said no one had any doubt that he was referring to the election case though he (then prime minister) did not mention it specifically which he decided on Feb 13, 1997.<BR/><BR/>Added the High Court judge: “After he was done with issuing that threat, he then proceeded to express his view that people should pay heavily for libel.<BR/><BR/>“He managed to get a single response from a Court of Appeal judge who asked whether he would be happy with a sum of RM1 million as damages for libel.<BR/><BR/>“He approved of it and he later on made known his satisfaction by promoting this judge (since deceased) to the Federal Court over many others who were senior to him when a vacancy arose.<BR/><BR/>“I was devastated after hearing all that but help came immediately after the “dialogue” was over when Federal Court judges came to my side and asked me to ignore him. Equally comforting were the words of my brother High Court judge who later told me that the then Prime Minister was too much.<BR/><BR/>“It will be recalled that the then prime minister not long after he assumed office had said, in a much publicised campaign against corruption, that he will put the fear of God in man but this apparently, given his diatribe in that conference, changed to instilling a fear of him if any judgment is to his dislike.”<BR/><BR/>Chin went on to say that to commemorate his “dialogue” with the judges a group picture was taken (which can be viewed by going to http://www.kkhighcourt.com/JudgesnMahathir.htm).<BR/><BR/>To rub it in, he said, Bernama circulated a press release with one appearing in a Sabah newspaper (The Daily Express May 25 1997) which “was far from stating the truth”. A month later, Chin said he was packed off to a boot camp from May 26-30 together with selected judges and judicial officers.<BR/><BR/>He said that the boot camp was without any doubt “an attempt to indoctrinate those attending the boot camp to hold the view that the government interest as being more important than all else when we are considering our judgement”.<BR/><BR/>“Stating this devilish notion was by no less a person than the President of the Court of Appeal. Everyone was quiet during the question sessions. Also invited to the boot camp was a lecturer from a university who berated the election case and the bright spot in this episode was that a judicial officer, during question time, told the lecturer that she had no question but only a statement to make which was that the lecturer was in contempt of court.<BR/><BR/>“The then prime minister was scheduled to talk but he did not turn up and instead sent his then deputy who instead of talking invited questions and the one question I remembered being asked was — Are politicians looking for girls when they are often seen loitering at posh hotel lobbies?<BR/><BR/>“The perversion of justice did not stop there. My brother judge Kamil Awang was one morning looking for me after clocking in; we were both then serving in Kuching, Sarawak. When I met up with him in his chambers he was distraught and he told me that he had last night received a telephone call from the then Chief Justice asking him to dismiss the election petition that he was going to hear in Kota Kinabalu.<BR/><BR/>“He sought my opinion as to what to do with the telephone call.<BR/><BR/>“We went into the possibility of making a police report or of writing to the Chief Justice a letter to record what he had said over the telephone but in the end he decided against it since it will be his words against that of the Chief Justice,” he said.<BR/><BR/>Chin told the court that he was happy to later on learn that Kamil did not bow to the pressure by the Chief Justice and went on to hear the petition and thereafter making a decision based on the law and evidence.<BR/><BR/>The High Court judge said he had twice stood unsuccessfully as a Barisan Nasional candidate for a parliamentary and later for a state seat in Sabah in the 1980s and in one of those elections he was defeated by a DAP candidate.<BR/><BR/>He said he had also heard other election petitions, namely Yusuf Abdul Rahman v Abdul Ajis & Ors and Lee Hie Kui v Song Swee Guan & Darrell Tsen.<BR/><BR/>“Now, though no longer the prime minister and so no longer able to carry out his threat to remove judges which should therefore dispel any fear which any judge may have of him, if ever there was such fear, nevertheless the coalition party that he led is still around and the second respondent won on a ticket of that coalition party and it may cross someone’s mind that I may have an axe to grind against the party concerned or any member thereof.<BR/><BR/>“The petitioner in this case may also have similar view with regard to my defeat by a candidate standing on the ticket of a party to which he belongs.<BR/><BR/>” So I wish to hear from the parties as to whether they (counsel or parties) in this case entertain any such notion and whether they wish to apply for my recusal so that, if any, I can make a decision thereon.<BR/><BR/>“After this disclosure, litigants who were affected by the hundreds of judgment that I had handed down since those infamous days may justifiably worry as to whether any of my judgments were in any way influenced by this attempt to hang the Sword of Damocles over my head.<BR/><BR/>“No amount of words from me would assuage you of your worry; you will have to read my judgments as to whether they are according to the evidence and the law or whether they were influenced by threat.”<BR/><BR/>Chin then adjourned for half an hour to let the parties digest what he had said and to consider whether they wished to make any application for his recusal.<BR/><BR/>However, they expressed their full confidence in him in presiding over the hearing of the case.antimamakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05306088584990747165noreply@blogger.com